供给侧结构性改革背景下中小企业内创业研究：模式选择与路径设计

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 内创业对于中小企业摆脱发展困境实现创新发展具有重要的现实意义。中小企业基于不同的视角可选择不同的内创业模式，且内创业活动表现出与大企业相异的模式，中小企业根据其发展的不同阶段，选择从混沌式创新、迭代式创新、微创新到反思式创新的组合；企业主作为中小企业内创业活动最为活跃的因素，需要在内创业过程中发挥主导作用并促进内创业活动的组织化，以实现基于个人特质的创新向基于组织特质的创新转变；由于中小企业本身的灵活性，其可能会对技术等外部冲击更为快速地反应，内创业有助于中小企业实现超越式发展。按照“目标（Objective）-行为（Behavior）-结果（Result）”的基本逻辑，中小企业可以形成目标演化、行为演化和结果演化三条基本路径融合的内创业路径，驱动中小企业系统创新、行为创新和公司创业。

关键词: 供给侧结构性改革, 中小企业, 内创业

Abstract: Intrapreneurship is a good choice for SMEs to get rid of the development dilemma and to realize innovation and development. Based on different perspectives, SMEs can choose different intrapreneurship modes, which exhibited distinct patterns with large enterprises. SMEs can choose the combination of chaos innovation, iterative innovation, micro innovation, and reflective innovation in different stages of development; as the most active factor in the intrapreneurship process, the owner of small and medium-sized business should play a leading role and promote the organization of entrepreneurial activities to realize the change from innovation based on personal characteristics to the innovation based on organizational characteristics;SMEs also can rapidly response to the impact of external shocks such as technology shocks, which helps SMEs to leapfrog big firms. According to “Objective - Behavior - Results” basic logic, there are three basis intrapreneurship paths for SMEs, such as target evolution path, behavior evolution path and evolution path, which can drive SMEs systems innovation, behavioral innovation, and corporate entrepreneurship.

Key words: supply-side structural reforms, SMEs, intrapreneurship

李先军. 供给侧结构性改革背景下中小企业内创业研究：模式选择与路径设计[J]. 商业研究.

LI Xian-jun. Intrapreneurship in the Context of Supply-Side Structural Reforms: Mode Selection and Path Design[J]. 商业研究.

参考文献

［1］Pinchot III G, Pinchot E. Intra-Corporate Entrepreneurship, Tarrytown School for Entrepreneurs［J］．1978. ［2］Abraham R. The relationship of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism to intrapreneurship and organizational commitment［J］．Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 1997, 18(4): 179-186. ［3］Drucker P F. The discipline of innovation［J］．Harvard business review, 1998, 76(6): 149-157. ［4］苗莉. 基于企业内创业的企业持续成长研究［J］．财经问题研究, 2005(2): 68-74. ［5］Martín-Rojas R, García-Morales V J, García-Sánchez E. The influence on corporate entrepreneurship of technological variables［J］．Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2011, 111(7): 984-1005. ［6］Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms［J］．Management science, 1983, 29(7): 770-791. ［7］Zahra S A, Pearce J A. Corporate entrepreneurship in smaller firms: the role of environment, strategy and organization［J］．Entrepreneurship, innovation and change, 1994, 3(1): 31-44. ［8］Schmelter R, Mauer R, Brsch C, et al. Boosting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs［J］．Human Resource Management, 2010, 49(4): 715-741. ［9］Carrier C. Intrapreneurship in large firms and SMEs: A comparative study［J］．International Small Business Journal, 1994, 12(3): 54-62. ［10］Carrier C. Intrapreneurship in small businesses: an exploratory study［J］．Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1996, 21(1): 5-21. ［11］黄群慧, 贺俊.“第三次工业革命”与中国经济发展战略调整——技术经济范式转变的视角［J］．中国工业经济, 2013(1): 5-18. ［12］D′aveni R A. Hyper competition［M］．Simon and Schuster, 2010. ［13］Haase H, Franco M, Félix M. Organisational learning and intrapreneurship: evidence of interrelated concepts［J］．Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2015, 36(8): 906-926. ［14］Zahra S A, Nielsen A P, Bogner W C. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development［J］．Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1999, 23(3): 169-189. ［15］Burgelman R A. Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms［J］．California Management Review, 1984, 26(3): 154-166. ［16］Burgelman R A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research［J］．Organization science, 1991,2(3): 239-262. ［17］Zahra S A, Jennings D F, Kuratko D F. The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field［J］．Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1999, 24(2): 45-45. ［18］廖建文，崔之瑜. 企业优势矩阵：竞争VS生态［J］．哈佛商业评论（中文版），2016（7）.

[1]	许平祥. 经济金融化与“全要素生产率之谜”：理论机制与实证检验[J]. 商业研究, 2023, 65(5): 90-.
[2]	于井远, 周萌 . 善治之税：数字化监管与中小企业融资困境[J]. 商业研究, 2023, 65(3): 70-.
[3]	刘佳丽, 荣垂青. 城市公用事业市场化与政府监管面临的困境——基于2010—2017年统计数据的耦合互动分析[J]. 商业研究, 2021, 63(4): 25-.
[4]	刘恩猛，吕文栋. 最低工资、劳动力成本与中小企业创新投入意愿 ——基于浙江的企业调查[J]. 商业研究, 2020, 62(10): 107-116.
[5]	吴莉昀. 政府补助与中小企业融资约束 ——异质性作用结果与机制研究 [J]. 商业研究, 2019, 61(8): 14-24.
[6]	卢英敏1，刘佳丽2. 东北老工业基地供给侧结构性矛盾与政府治理变革[J]. 商业研究, 2019, 61(6): 26-33.
[7]	王贞洁，李真真. 供给侧结构性改革中商业信用再配置的经济后果：“锦上添花”抑或“雪中送炭” [J]. 商业研究, 2019, 61(11): 12-22.
[8]	姚洪心，吴伊婷，赵袁军. 中小企业信贷、银行规模与征信服务模式[J]. 商业研究, 2018, 60(1): 133-142.
[9]	滕晓梅，刘敏娴. 新三板扩容与中小企业融资 [J]. 商业研究, 2016, 58(10): 105-113.