期望绩效反馈、行业竞争压力与企业并购
——基于沪深A股上市公司的实证研究

商业研究

期望绩效反馈、行业竞争压力与企业并购 ——基于沪深A股上市公司的实证研究

黄昌富，李桑迪

三峡大学经济与管理学院，湖北宜昌 443002

收稿日期:2017-06-02 出版日期:2017-10-10
作者简介:黄昌富（1959-），男，湖北当阳人，三峡大学经济与管理学院教授，研究方向：战略管理；李桑迪（1992-），女，湖北当阳人，三峡大学经济与管理学院研究生，研究方向：战略管理。

Expectation Performance Feedback，Industry Competitive Pressure and Enterprise M&A: An Empirical Study based on Shanghai and Shenzhen A - share Listed Companies

HUANG Chang-fu, LI Sang-di

School of Economics and Management, Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China

Received:2017-06-02 Online:2017-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 并购是企业利用外部资源实现竞争优势的战略选择，本文以2011-2015年间沪深两市发生并购行为主并方的A股上市公司为研究样本，实证考察企业期望绩效反馈、行业竞争压力与企业并购行为的关系，以及行业竞争压力对期望绩效反馈与企业并购之间关系的调节作用。研究发现，当企业期望绩效反馈为负向时，随着期望绩效差距的扩大，企业并购意愿及并购规模先升后降，呈倒U型关系；行业竞争压力正向促进企业并购行为，当企业未实现组织期望绩效时，行业竞争压力对期望绩效差距与企业并购行为的倒U型关系存在显著的正向调节效应。上述结论深化了对期望绩效反馈问题的认识，间接考察了企业高管与股东或董事会之间在期望绩效差距存在的情况下在企业并购决策上的分工机制，为企业并购行为的影响因素提供了新的视角，对经理层和股东如何通过理性的并购决策弥合期望绩效差距、防范并购风险具有一定的理论解释意义和实践参考价值。

关键词: 期望绩效反馈, 行业竞争压力, 企业并购

Abstract: M&A is a strategic choice for enterprises to realize competitive advantage by using external resources. This paper takes the acquirers in A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen as research samples from 2011 to 2015, and investigates the relationship between the expected performance feedback, the competitive pressure of the industry and M&A behavior, and the moderating effect of competitive pressure on the relationship between expected performance feedback and mergers and acquisitions. The results show that when the expected performance feedback is negative, with the widening of expected performance gap, the M&A intention and scale will rise first and then fall, showing inverted U- shaped relationship; industry competition pressure promotes the M&A positively, when the expected performance of the organization is not realized, the competitive pressure of the industry has a significantly positive effect on the inverted U-shaped relationship between expected performance gap and M&A behavior.The above conclusions deepen the understanding of expected performance feedback, indirectly investigate the division mechanism between enterprise executives and shareholders or board of directors in the process of enterprise M&A decision-making under the expectation performance gap, and provide a new perspective for influence factors of M&A behavior, which has theoretical significance and practical reference value for managers and shareholders how to close the expected performance gap and prevent M&A risk though rational M&A decision-making.

Key words: expected performance feedback, industry competitive pressure, enterprise mergers and acquisitions

黄昌富，李桑迪. 期望绩效反馈、行业竞争压力与企业并购 ——基于沪深A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 商业研究.

HUANG Chang-fu, LI Sang-di. Expectation Performance Feedback，Industry Competitive Pressure and Enterprise M&A: An Empirical Study based on Shanghai and Shenzhen A - share Listed Companies[J]. 商业研究.

参考文献

［1］陈仕华,卢昌崇,姜广省,等.国企高管政治晋升对企业并购行为的影响——基于企业成长压力理论的实证研究［J］．管理世界,2015(9):125-136. ［2］姜付秀,张敏,陆正飞,等.管理者过度自信、企业扩张与财务困境［J］．经济研究,2009(1):131-143. ［3］Miller K D,Leiblein M J.Corporate risk-return relations:Returns variability versus downside risk［J］．Academy of Management journal,1996,39(1):91-122. ［4］Palmer T B,Wiseman R M.Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty:A holistic model of risk［J］． Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(11):1037-1062. ［5］Schneider,S.L. Framing and Conflict：Aspiration Level Contingency,the Status Quo and Current Theories of Risky Choice［J］．Experimental Psychol-ogy：Learning，Memory an Cognition,1992,18(5)：1040. ［6］贺小刚,连玲燕,吕斐斐.期望差距与企业家的风险决策偏好——基于中国家族上市公司的数据分析［J］．管理科学学报,2016,19(8):2-19. ［7］李晓翔,刘春林.困难情境下组织冗余作用研究:兼谈市场搜索强度的调节作用［J］．南开管理评论,2013,16(3):140-148. ［8］Audia,P.G.and H.R.Greve. Less Likely toFail:Low Performance,Firm Size and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry［J］．Management Science,2006,52(1):83-94. ［9］连玲燕,贺小刚,高皓.业绩期望差距与企业战略调整——基于中国上市公司的实证研究.管理世界,2014(11):119-132. ［10］王菁,程博,孙元欣.期望绩效反馈对企业研发和慈善捐赠行为的影响［J］．管理世界,2014(8):115-133. ［11］连玲燕,周兵,贺小刚,等.经营期望、管理自主权与战略变革［J］．经济研究,2015(8):31-44. ［12］贺小刚,连玲燕,张远飞.“富则思安”吗？——基于中国民营上市公司的实证分析［J］．管理世界,2013(7):130-144.