企业社会责任行为与企业竞争优势：转化效应与逻辑
——来自中国100强社会责任上市公司经验证据的分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文从竞争优势构成的多层次性入手，剖析企业社会责任与竞争优势之间的契合点和转化机理；选取2009-2015年中国不同性质的社会责任前100强上市公司作为研究对象，引入CSR行为理论探究不同CSR行为在竞争优势不同层面的转化效应。从总体上看，CSR活动对企业竞争优势有显著提升效应，在资源能力与企业价值层面转化效应较好，但企业绩效层面转化效应不显著；不同CSR行为向竞争优势转化的效应不同，而且企业规模越大，转化效应越显著，这一结论（发现），基于竞争优势来源构成的不同层次，对CSR-CFP关系之谜给出一种合理解释。

关键词: 企业社会责任, 竞争优势, 转化效应

Abstract: Beginning with the multi-level of corporate competitive advantage, this paper analyzes the connection and transformation mechanism between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage; by introducing CSR behavior theory and selecting the top 100 CSR public corporation in China from 2009 to 2015 as the samples of research，the paper explores the transformation effect on different types of CSR behaviors contributing to competitive advantage in different levels. In general, CSR activity has a significant effect on the corporate competitive advantage, the effect on capacity and value is better, while the effect on performance isn′t significant; the effect of different CSR behaviors on competitive advantage is different, and the larger of the corporate scale, the transformation effect is more significant. This conclusion gives a reasonable explanation for the puzzle of CSR-CFP relationship based on the different levels of competitive advantage sources.

Key words: corporate social responsibility, competitive advantage, transformation effect

吴定玉. 企业社会责任行为与企业竞争优势：转化效应与逻辑 ——来自中国100强社会责任上市公司经验证据的分析[J]. 商业研究.

WU Ding-yu. Effects and Logic-An Analysis based on the Empirical Evidence from Top 100 CSR Public Corporations in China[J]. 商业研究.

参考文献

［1］Powell, T C. Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations［J］．Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22(9):875-888. ［2］JW Overby, SF Gardial, RB Woodruff. French versus American consumers’ attachment of value to a product in a common consumption context: A cross-national comparison［J］．Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2004,32(4):437-460. ［3］Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage［J］．Journal of Management,1991(17): 99-120. ［4］张敬伟，王迎军.竞争优势及其演化研究现状评介与未来展望外［J］．外国经济与管理， 2010,32(3):1-9. ［5］J Kim，HJ Song，CK Lee. Effects of corporate social responsibility and internal marketing on organizational commitment and turnover intentions［J］．International Journal of Hospitality Management,2016,55:25-32. ［6］BE Joyner,D Payne. Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values,Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility［J］．Journal of Business Ethics,2002,41(4):297-311. ［7］ShuChuan Chu,& JhihSyuan Lin. Consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility in the United States and China: A study of female cosmetics consumers［J］．International Journal of Strategic Communication,2013,7:43-64. ［8］T Loikkanen,K Hyytinen. Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitiveness-Empirical Results and Future Challenges［J］．Springer Netherlands,2011,27:151-170. ［9］Porter ME,Kramer MR. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy［J］．Harvard Business Review,2002,80(12): 57-68. ［10］Constantin Belu,Cristiana Manescu.Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance［J］．Applied Economics,2013,45(19):2751-2764. ［11］Carroll,A. B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance［J］．The Academy of Management Review,1979(4): 497-530. ［12］Clarkson,Max B. E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance［J］． The Academy of Management Review,1995,20(1):92-117. ［13］Zadek,S. Going to scale: Aligning corporate responsibility to strategies for business and national competitiveness［J］．Institution Ethics Reflexion,2005,6(14):1-28. ［14］BW Husted,JDJ Salazar. Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance［J］． Journal of Management Studies,2006,43(1):75-91. ［15］Maon F,Lindgreen A,& Swaen V. Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development［J］． International Journal of Management Reviews,2010,12(1):20-35. ［16］眭文娟，谭劲松,张慧玉.企业社会责任行为中的战略管理视角理论综述［J］．管理学报，2012（3）：345-355. ［17］金碚企业竞争力测评的理论与方法［J］．中国工业经济，2003(3)：5-13. ［18］边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效［J］．中国社会科学，2000(2)：87-99. ［19］Nahapiet,J.,& Ghoshal,S. Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage［J］． Academy of Management Review,1998,23:242-266. ［20］Weststlund H. Implications of social capital of business in the Knowledge Economy: Theoretical considerations［C］．International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital. Presented for the International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital,held by the Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office,Japan,in Tokyo on 24 and 25th March 2003. ［21］Collins C. J,C1ark K.D. Strategic human resources,top management team social networks and firm performance: The role of human resource practice in creating organizational competitive advantage［J］． Academy of Management Journal,2003,46:740-751. ［22］赵瑞.企业社会资本、财务绩效及其持续性——基于我国上市公司面板数据［J］．宏观经济研究，2012（7）：45-49+79. ［23］张景峰. 竞争优势与企业价值研究［D］．上海:同济大学，2008. ［24］周晨. 中国上市公司企业社会责任的竞争优势战略属性研究——来自沪深两市731家上市公司经验证据［J］．华东经济管理，2010,24(4)：111-117. ［25］Pava,ML.,& Krausz,J. The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost［J］． Journal of Business Ethics,1996,15:321-357. ［26］Stanwick PA. Corporate strategies in the environmental management industry: An examination of organizational performance［J］． Eco-Management and Auditing,1998,5(2):57-61. ［27］Sethi SP. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic framework［J］． California Management Review,1975,17(3):58-64. ［28］Carlisle Ysanne M.,Faulkner David O. Corporate social responsibility: A stages framework［J］． European Business Journal,2004,16(4):143-151.

[1]	刘源. 企业社会责任、管理者能力与董事网络同群效应[J]. 商业研究, 2023, 65(3): 127-.
[2]	张多蕾1,2，胡公瑾3. 企业社会责任、投资者异质信念与融资约束[J]. 商业研究, 2020, 62(9): 132-141.
[3]	高伟1,2，王全景1. 海外投资与企业社会责任 ——基于东道国异质性与企业异质性的实证检验[J]. 商业研究, 2018, 60(8): 88-98.
[4]	敦帅1，陈强1，刁雅钰2. 基于颠覆性创新的分享经济企业竞争优势构建研究[J]. 商业研究, 2018, 60(12): 20-27.
[5]	徐莉萍，刘铭倩，刘宁. 环境规制能有效抑制哪些企业环境犯罪行为？ ——来自2011-2015年上市公司的证据[J]. 商业研究, 2018, 60(10): 138-146.

企业社会责任行为与企业竞争优势：转化效应与逻辑 ——来自中国100强社会责任上市公司经验证据的分析

Effects and Logic-An Analysis based on the Empirical Evidence from Top 100 CSR Public Corporations in China

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics