商业研究

• 产业经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境规制、生态创新与企业竞争力 ——基于矿产资源企业数据的分析

何玉梅,罗巧,朱筱薇   

  1. (成都理工大学 商学院,成都 610059)
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-30 出版日期:2018-03-23
  • 作者简介:何玉梅(1964-),女,山东高密人,成都理工大学商学院教授,研究方向:环境经济与企业发展、创新经济学;罗巧(1994-),女,成都人,成都理工大学商学院研究生,研究方向:资源开发与可持续发展;朱筱薇(1989-),女,武汉人,成都理工大学商学院研究生,研究方向:产业经济学、环境经济学。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省社会科学重点研究基地系统科学与企业发展研究中心项目“环境规制、生态创新对企业竞争力的影响研究”,项目编号:Xq16C11;四川省科技计划项目,项目编号:2017ZR0121;四川省省属高校科研创新团队建设计划,项目编号:18TD0016。

Environmental Regulation, Ecological Innovation and Enterprise Competitiveness: An Analysis based on Data of Mineral Resources Enterprises

HE Yu-mei, LUO Qiao, ZHU Xiao-wei   

  1. (School of Business, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
  • Received:2017-11-30 Online:2018-03-23

摘要: 新古典经济学认为环境规制导致了企业成本增加,而“波特假说”认为设置合理的环境规制政策可以刺激企业产生补偿生态创新行为、提高企业绩效,使企业获得竞争优势。基于“波特假说”与新古典经济学派观点的冲突,本文利用我国沪深两市42家矿产资源上市公司2010-2015年的3024个面板数据,实证分析环境规制、生态创新和企业竞争力之间的关系。结果表明:在短期内,环境规制对企业进行生态创新有激励作用;企业进行生态创新可以提升企业竞争力,环境规制与生态创新可以促进企业竞争力的提升,但环境规制对企业竞争力的影响存在一定的滞后效应。上述结论为我国企业实现生态创新与企业竞争力提升的双重目标提供了借鉴与参考,对于我国政府部门制定有效的环境规制政策提供了理论依据。

关键词: 环境规制, 生态创新, 企业竞争力, 波特假说

Abstract: The traditional view of New Classical Economics is that environmental regulation will lead to the increase of the cost of enterprises, but “Porter Hypothesis” considers that a reasonable set of environmental regulation policy can stimulate the enterprises to carry out ecological innovation, generate innovation compensation effect, improve enterprise performance, so as to make the enterprises gain competitive advantages. Based on the conflict between “Porter Hypothesis” and the New Classical Economics, this paper uses 3024 panel data of 42 mineral resources listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2010 to 2015 and conducts the empirical research on the relationship among environmental regulation, ecological innovation and enterprise competitiveness. The results show that environmental regulation has incentive effects on the ecological innovation of enterprises in the short term; enterprises with ecological innovation can promote the competitiveness, and ecological innovation can promote the enterprise competitiveness, but the influence of environmental regulation has lag effect. The above conclusions will provide reference for the promotion of ecological innovation and enterprise competitiveness, and provide the theoretical basis for the government departments to formulate effective environmental regulation policies.

Key words: environmental regulation, ecological innovation, enterprise competitiveness, Potter Hypothesis