商业研究

商业研究

• 商经理论 • 上一篇    下一篇

“股东压迫”救济路径及效果：实证与域外镜鉴

武胜男   

  1. (吉林大学 法学院,长春 130012)
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-18 出版日期:2019-08-22
  • 作者简介:武胜男（1994-），女，辽宁大连人，吉林大学法学院博士研究生，研究方向：商法学、公司法学。

Relief Path and Effect of “Shareholder Oppression”: Empirical Study and Extraterritorial Mirror

WU Sheng-nan   

  1. (School of Law,Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
  • Received:2019-01-18 Online:2019-08-22

摘要： 我国公司法对受压迫股东提供了两类救济路径，但均存在一定的缺陷。通过实证研究发现在原则性规定层面，《公司法》第20条第1款、第2款中的“滥用股东权利”缺乏阐释，司法实践中对此认定模糊，一些利益受损股东并不能依据该条获得充分的救济，法院对第2款规定的救济方式理解亦不一致。具体性规定层面，《公司法》第22条在司法实践中的适用缺乏灵活性，也未与《公司法》第20条第1款、第2款相联结。《公司法》第74条的适用情形有限，无法有效保护受压迫股东的退出利益。从为受压迫股东提供体系化保护角度分析，上述法条之间也缺乏互动与协调。结合我国立法现实及司法实践，在适当借鉴英美法相关规则的基础上，我国《公司法》对受压迫股东救济路径的完善应从增设有关“滥用股东权利”的司法解释,将股东压迫内涵纳入到“滥用股东权利”项下，协调《公司法》第22条、第74条和第20条第1款、第2款之间的规定着手。

关键词: 股东压迫救济, 滥用股东权利, 股东利益, 有限责任公司

Abstract: Our company law provides two kinds of remedies for the oppressed shareholders, but both of them have some defects. Empirical research finds that in the aspect of principled provisions, “abuse of shareholder′s rights” in Article 20, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 of the Company Law lacks explanation, which is vague in judicial practice. Some shareholders whose interests have been damaged can not get adequate relief according to this article, and the court′s understanding of the relief method stipulated in paragraph 2 is also inconsistent. At the level of specific provisions, the application of Article 22 of the Company Law in judicial practice lacks flexibility, and is not linked with Article 20, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 of the Company Law.The application of Article 74 of the Company Law is limited, which can not effectively protect the interests of the depressed shareholders.From the perspective of providing systematic protection for the oppressed shareholders, there is also a lack of interaction and coordination between the above-mentioned laws.Combining with the legislative reality and judicial practice of our country, on the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant rules of Anglo-American Law, the perfection of the remedy path of oppressed shareholders in our Company Law should be based on the addition of judicial interpretation of “abuse of shareholders′rights”, incorporating the connotation of shareholders′ oppression into the item of “abuse of shareholders′rights”, and coordinating the second part of the Company Law. The provisions between article 2, article 74 and article 20, paragraphs 1 and 2, shall be taken into account.

Key words: shareholder oppression relief, abuse of shareholder rights, shareholder interests, limited liability company