商业研究

• 商法论丛 • 上一篇    

反不正当竞争法视野下商业道德认定的新思路 ——基于法律论证分析框架

叶明,陈耿华   

  1. (西南政法大学 经济法学院,重庆 401120)
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-16 出版日期:2017-12-20
  • 作者简介:叶明(1972-),男,四川三台人,西南政法大学经济法学院教授,博士生导师,法学博士,研究方向:竞争法;陈耿华(1989-),女,广东惠来人,西南政法大学经济法学院博士研究生,研究方向:竞争法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目,项目编号:15BFX125;中国法学会青年调研项目,项目编号:CLS(2016)Y12;中国法学会自选项目,项目编号:CLS(2015)D100。

New Way of Definition of Business Ethics under the View of Anti-Unfair Competition Law:Based on the Framework of Legal Argumentation

YE Ming, CHEN Geng-hua   

  1. (School of Economic Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
  • Received:2017-07-16 Online:2017-12-20

摘要: 反不正当竞争法视野下的商业道德内涵多元且极为抽象,既有以行业惯例、创设具体细则认定商业道德的做法无法从根本上克服商业道德的不确定性。其缘由是归入决定论立场的前者奉行简单的逻辑推演而未予利益平衡,忽略个案商业道德的“特质性”,且不同领域的行业惯例通常不具通约性并呈阶段性特征,无法为商业道德认定输送稳定源泉;纳入决断论立场的后者既难以把握商业道德的“不唯一性”,亦无法确保所作裁判基于客观要求而非恣意,也并未达致商业道德的客观认定。而法律论证分析框架不推崇从前提到结论的简单推演,充分进行利益衡量且重视在讨论中不断论证,并以可视化的形式规则和技术规则最大限度约束司法裁量权,故可作为商业道德认定的新思路。法律论证分析框架的具体运用体现为:对商业道德的认定理由进行多元分解且细致还原其推导步骤,并以论证链的形式分层论证这些多元理由。

关键词: 商业道德, 不确定性, 决定论, 决断论, 法律论证

Abstract: In the view of Anti-unfair Competition Law, the connotation of business ethics is diverse and very abstracted. Business ethics is identified by industry practices and specific rules is difficult to fundamentally overcome the uncertainty of business ethics. The reason is that the former as a legislative decision standpoint which adopts simple logic deduction but does not balance the interests and ignores the particularity of business ethics in the case. In addition, the industry practices which show periodical characteristics are different in different fields, so they cannot provide food for the business ethics steadily;the latter as a judicial decision standpoint is difficult to grasp the diversity of business ethics and can′t ensure the judgment based on the results of the objective requirements rather than arbitrary, so it doesn′t apply to identify business ethics. And the framework of legal argumentation does not praise the simple deduction of previous conclusions, but carries out the interests measurement and demonstrates constantly in the process of discussion, and uses visual formal rules and technical rules to restrict judicial discretion, so it can be regarded as a new way to identify business ethics. The specific application of frame of legal argumentation is as follows: the reasons for the determination of business ethics are analyzed in detail and show steps of deduction as well as demonstrate these pluralistic reasons hierarchically with the form of chains.

Key words: business ethics, uncertainty, legislative decision standpoint, judicial decision standpoint, legal argumentation