特质情感对绩效评估程序公正感的作用机制及效应研究

商业研究

特质情感对绩效评估程序公正感的作用机制及效应研究

江卫东，徐秋杭

南京理工大学经济管理学院，南京 210094

收稿日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2017-05-25
作者简介:江卫东（1967-），男，安徽桐城人，南京理工大学经济管理学院教授，经济学博士，研究方向：组织行为学和人力资源管理；徐秋杭（1992-）, 女，安徽马鞍山人，南京理工大学经济管理学院研究生，研究方向：人力资源管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“绩效评估公正感的结构、前因及效应研究”，项目编号：71172103。

A Study of the Mechanism and Effects of Trait Affect on Procedural Justice Perception in Performance Appraisals

JIANG Wei-dong，XU Qiu-hang

School of Economics & Management，Nanjing University of Science & Technology，Nanjing 210094，China

Received:2016-12-26 Online:2017-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 员工对绩效评估程序公正性的感知是其组织公正感的重要内容，不同特质情感的个体对绩效评估系统会产生不同的主观认知。本文构建了员工特质情感对绩效评估程序公正感的作用机制模型，并通过追踪调查数据对该模型进行检验。结果显示：积极特质情感对绩效评估程序公正感的两个维度（评估系统公正感、评估者公正感）存在显著正向影响，消极特质情感对评估系统公正感、评估者公正感存在显著负向影响；组织政治知觉在特质情感与绩效评估程序公正感两维度之间起中介作用。研究结论从情感视角拓宽了绩效评估程序公正感的前因变量研究领域，相关对策有助于提高受评者的绩效评估公正感。

关键词: 纵向调查, 积极特质情感, 消极特质情感, 绩效评估程序公正感, 组织政治知觉

Abstract: Employees′ procedural justice perception in performance appraisals is an important part of organizational justice, and individuals with different trait affects will have different subjective perceptions of performance appraisal system. This paper constructs the effect mechanism model of employees′ trait affect on procedural justice perception in performance appraisals, and tests the model by the following-up data. The results show that ratee′s positive trait affect has a significant positive effect on the two dimensions of procedural justice perception in performance appraisals (justice perception of system, justice perception of raters), and negative trait affect has a significant negative effect on the justice perception of the system and raters; perception of organizational politics mediates the relationship between trait affect and justice perception of system and raters. In conclusion, the findings of this research broaden the research field of antecedents of procedural justice perception in performance appraisals from the perspective of affect, and related countermeasures put forward will help managers improve the ratee′s procedural justice perception in performance appraisals.

Key words: longitudinal investigation, positive trait affect, negative trait affect, procedural justice perception in performance appraisals, perception of organizational politics

江卫东，徐秋杭 . 特质情感对绩效评估程序公正感的作用机制及效应研究[J]. 商业研究.

JIANG Wei-dong，XU Qiu-hang. A Study of the Mechanism and Effects of Trait Affect on Procedural Justice Perception in Performance Appraisals[J]. 商业研究.

参考文献

［1］Colquitt J A, Scott B A, et al. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives［J］．Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(2): 199-236. ［2］Watson D, Clark L A, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales［J］．Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(6): 1063-1070．［3］陈丽芬，江卫东．绩效评估公正感问题研究－结构、前因及效应［M］．北京:科学出版社，2014. ［4］Ferris G R, Adams G, Kolodinsky R W, et al. Perceptions of organizational Politics: Theory and research directions. Yammarino F J, Dansereau F. Research in Multi-level Issues, The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues［M］．Oxford, England: JAI Press/Elsevier Science, 2002:179-254. ［5］Turban D B, Lee F K, et al. Be happy, don’t wait: The role of trait affect in job search［J］．Personnel Psychology, 2013,66(2): 483-514. ［6］Ng T W H, Sorensen K L. Dispositional affectivity and work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis［J］．Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009,39(6):1255-1287. ［7］Kacmar K M, Carlson D S. Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple sample investigation［J］．Journal of Management,1997,23(5): 627-658. ［8］Morris E W. Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and directions for future research［J］．Academy of Management Annals,2011,5(1):373-412. ［9］Dulebohn J H, Ferris G R. The role of influence tactics in perception of performance evaluations’ fairness［J］．Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(3): 288-303. ［10］Adams G L, Treadway D C, Stepina L P. The role of dispositions in politics perception formation: The predictive capacity of negative and positive affectivity, equity sensitivity, and self-efficacy［J］．Journal of Managerial Issues, 2008, 20(4): 545-563. ［11］Karatepe O M, Babakus E, Yavas U. Affectivity and organizational politics as antecedents of burnout among frontline hotel employees［J］．International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2012, 31(1): 66-75. ［12］Atinc G, Darrat M, Fuller B, et al. Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of theoretical antecedents［J］．Journal of Managerial Issues, 2010,22(4):494-513. ［13］Judge T A, Kammeyer-Mueller J D. Affect, satisfaction, and performance. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. L Cooper (Eds.),Research companion to emotion in organizations［M］．Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008：136-151. ［14］Ferris G R, Munyon T P, Basik K et al. The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship comonents［J］．Human Resource Management Review, 2008,18(3):146-163. ［15］Wanberg C R, Gavin M B, Bunce L W. Perceived fairness of layoffs among individuals who have been laid off: A longitudinal study［J］．Personnel Psychology, 1999,52(1): 59-84. ［16］Ball G A et al. Just and unjust punishment: inuences on subordinate performance and citizenship［J］．Academy of Management Journal, 1994,37(2):299-322. ［17］Chang C, Rosen C C, Levy P E. The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination［J］．Academy of Management Journal, 2009,52(4):779-801. ［18］Rosen C C, Levy P E, Hall R J. Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance［J］．Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006,91(1): 211-220. ［19］Chong M L, Scully G. The roles of organizational politics and fairness in the relationship between performance management systems and trust［J］．Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2015,27(1): 25-53. ［20］Wiltshire J, Bourdage J S, Lee K. Honesty-Humility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes［J］．Journal of Business and Psychology, 2014,29(2): 235-251.