资源型企业跨区转移行为胁迫效应影响因素分析
——以煤炭产业为例

商业研究

资源型企业跨区转移行为胁迫效应影响因素分析 ——以煤炭产业为例

李存芳，王维，王梅玲

（江苏师范大学商学院/产业经济与企业组织研究中心，江苏徐州 221116）

收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2018-10-10
作者简介:李存芳（1963-），男，江苏兴化人，江苏师范大学商学院教授，管理学博士，研究方向：系统分析与资源管理；王维（1993-），本文通讯作者，女，江苏徐州人，江苏师范大学商学院研究生，研究方向：系统分析与资源管理；王梅玲（1987-），女，山东青岛人，江苏师范大学商学院讲师，经济学博士，研究方向：国际经济与资源管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目，项目编号：71573110；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目，项目编号：KYCX18-2020。

An Analysis of Influence Factors of Stress Effect on Cross-regional Transfer Behavior of Resource-oriented Enterprises： Taking Coal Industry as an Example

LI Cun-fang, WANG Wei, WANG Mei-ling

(Business School/ Center For Industrial Economy and Enterprise Organization, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Received:2018-03-16 Online:2018-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 资源型企业跨区转移行为的胁迫效应是一个基于新兴实践的管理科学问题。本文采取系统工程的思想与方法，通过访谈调查和文献研究，分析资源型企业跨区转移行为胁迫效应的机理，提炼出四个胁迫效应的影响因素，选取中西部三省区资源产业2000-2015年的相关数据进行了实证检验。研究表明：在资源型企业跨区转移行为胁迫效应的影响因素中，“环境规制”的作用强度最重，“企业发展方式水平”、“企业规模”、“企业环保投资水平”的作用依次递减；资源富集地政府环境内生性和外生性政策规制越严，越能缓解资源开发的负外部性和胁迫效应的强度；资源型企业以“三废”利用为重点的发展方式水平越高，其胁迫效应越弱；资源型企业规模越大，环境修复成本优势、社会约束、自律意识、绿色开采能力越强，胁迫效应越弱；胁迫效应的强度随着资源型企业环保技术和设施设备投资水平的提高而降低。上述四个方面的胁迫效应因素反映了我国企业跨区转移的共性及资源型企业的个性环境胁迫的叠加作用，其作用表现和机理是实施相关管理的重要参考。

关键词: 转移行为, 胁迫效应, 资源型企业

Abstract: The stress effect of the cross-regional transfer behaviors of coal resource-oriented enterprises is an emerging practical management science issue. The paper takes the thought of system engineering to analyze the mechanism of stress effect of the cross-regional transfer behaviors of coal resource-oriented enterprises systematically through methods of in-depth interview and literature studies. Four intervention factors on the stress effect are preliminarily extracted and empirically verified by the relevant data of the resource industry in the central and western regions of China in 2000-2015. Research indicates that four main intervention factors on stress effect of the cross-regional transfer behaviors of coal resource-oriented enterprises are environmental regulation, development mode level, enterprise scale and investment level of environmental protection, and the function intensity declines successively; the stricter the environmentally endogenous and exogenous political regulations are, the more the negative externality and the stress effect of resource development can be alleviated; the higher level the coal resource-oriented enterprises utilize the “three wastes”, the weaker the stress effect is;the larger the scale of coal resource-oriented enterprises is, the stronger the cost advantages of environmental restoration, the social constraints, the self-discipline awareness, and the green mining capacity are, and the weaker the stress effect is;the intensity of the stress effect decreases with the improvement of environmental protection technology and facility equipment investment level. The coercive factors mentioned above reflect the commonness of trans-regional transfer of Chinese enterprises and the superposition of individual environmental coercion of resource-based enterprises. Its performance and mechanism are important reference for the implementation of relevant management.

Key words: transfer behavior, stress effect, resource-oriented enterprises

李存芳，王维，王梅玲. 资源型企业跨区转移行为胁迫效应影响因素分析 ——以煤炭产业为例[J]. 商业研究.

LI Cun-fang, WANG Wei, WANG Mei-ling. An Analysis of Influence Factors of Stress Effect on Cross-regional Transfer Behavior of Resource-oriented Enterprises： Taking Coal Industry as an Example[J]. 商业研究.

参考文献

注释： ①冀中能源“低碳运行生态矿山示范项目研究与建设”成果通过国家验收，2010.4.16. 参考文献：［1］李存芳. 中国可耗竭资源型企业转移区位选择行为的实证研究［M］．北京：科学出版社, 2015. ［2］沈镭,高丽.中国西部能源及矿业开发与环境保护协调发展研究［J］．中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(10):17-23. ［3］Ramassmy B,Yeung M, Laforet S. China′s outward foreign direce investment: Location choice and firm ownership［J］．Journal of World Business,2012,47(1):17-25. ［4］万伦来,刘福,郭文慧. 煤炭开采对生态系统功能的胁迫作用：模型·实证［J］．环境科学研究,2016, 29(6):916-924. ［5］谢雄标,吴越,冯忠垒,等. 中国资源型企业绿色行为调查研究［J］．中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(6): 5-11. ［6］Chakraborty D.Does pollution haven hypothesis holds good for India? Evidences from cross-state FDI inflow patterns［R］．Working Paper,2010. ［7］Dijkstra B R,Mathew A J,Mukherjee A. Environmental regulation: An incentive for foreign direct investment［J］．Review of International Economics, 2011,19(3):568-578. ［8］罗世兴,沙景华. 加拿大矿业企业社会责任管理及启示［J］．资源与产业,2014,16(2): 27-31. ［9］van der Ploeg F, Withagen C. Is there really a green paradox?［J］．Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012,64(3):342-363. ［10］Pao H T, Tsai C M. Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI and GDP: Evidence from a panel of BRIC countries［J］．Energy, 2011,36(1):685-693. ［11］Maria C D, Lange I, Werf E V D. Should we be worried about the green paradox? Announcement effects of the acid rain program ［J］．Cesifo Working Paper, 2014, 69:143-162. ［12］王安. 西部能源如何开发利用［J］．求是,2013(3):41-43. ［13］Bohac J,Lipton J．Environmental impact of the coal industry and resource equivalency method for environmental damage with ecological indicators［J］．Springer Netherlands,2015, 33(4):176-179. ［14］Sezgin Z. Ecological modernization at the intersection of environment and energy［J］．International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy,2013,3(5): 93-101．［15］Zeng D Z，Zhao L．Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration［J］．Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2009,58(2):141-153．［16］Pargaland S,Wheeler D.Informal environmental regulations in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia［J］．Journal of Political Economy, 1996,104(6):1314-1327. ［17］谢和平,王金华,申宝宏,等.煤炭开采新理念——科学开采与科学产能［J］．煤炭学报,2012,37(7): 1069-1079. ［18］Clarkson P M，Li Y,Richardson G D. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis［J］．Accounting，Organizations and Society,2008,33(4-5): 303-327. ［19］董大海,冯雪飞. 扎根理论与中央企业发展方式转型［J］．改革,2014(9):114-122.